In a recent commentary, CNN host Fareed Zakaria highlighted critical issues concerning U.S.-China relations, particularly focusing on how the U.S. government has misjudged China’s economic leverage. This misinterpretation, according to Zakaria, not only weakens the U.S. position globally but also jeopardizes the American economy.
The heart of Zakaria’s argument rests on the assertion that “you can’t bully a supply-chain superpower.” As an economic titan, China wields significant influence in global supply chains, as evidenced by its position as the largest exporter of goods, shipping approximately $3.4 trillion worth of products in 2023. This status grants China leverage that the U.S. appears to underestimate.
One of the main points Zakaria addresses is the impact of tariffs imposed by the U.S. government, particularly those aimed at China. He references economist Dean Baker, noting that these tariffs will primarily inflict pain on the American economy. The World Bank has projected U.S. growth to decline sharply from 2.8 percent to 1.4 percent, while China’s growth rates remain stable. This indicates that while the U.S. is escalating its trade war, it is the American consumers and businesses that will bear the brunt of the impact.
Zakaria elaborates on the evolving landscape of the global economy, stressing the fact that economic interdependence has changed the rules of engagement. Scholars Henry Farrell and Abraham L. Newman have pointed out that while nations like the U.S. have historically wielded economic power through sanctions and other punitive measures, this strategy may backfire. The more the U.S. relies on overusing its economic dominance, the more limits it encounters, leading to a vulnerability that China seems poised to exploit.
The notion of America’s economic hegemony is further complicated by the unique nature of trade versus finance. While the U.S. has successfully weaponized its financial system, using frameworks like the SWIFT system to impose sanctions, trade operates under different rules. Zakaria notes that China’s ability to substitute U.S. goods during trade disputes—such as its quick pivot to alternative fuels when the U.S. restricted ethane exports—illustrates a fundamental difference between the two sectors.
Moreover, Zakaria points out China’s dominance in processing essential materials like nickel, cobalt, and lithium, which are critical for advancements in technology and green energy. This situation underscores the danger of the U.S. relying on coercive measures against a nation that holds strategic resources. When the U.S. curtailed exports of advanced chipmaking technology to China, the latter retaliated by banning exports of vital materials to America.
This dynamic has significant repercussions for the U.S. economy. Zakaria emphasizes that the U.S.’s strategy—involving threats of tariffs and sanctions—stems from a flawed understanding of its own position relative to China. He argues that China is actively working to reduce its dependency on American imports, thereby fortifying its own standing in the global market.
In the context of escalating sanctions, Zakaria notes that the number of U.S. sanctions has increased dramatically over the past two decades. This trend has reached an unprecedented level, leading to measures that extend beyond traditional trade-related sanctions, such as revoking visas for foreign students. The implications of such actions are broad, impacting not only economic relationships but also alliances that the U.S. has historically relied upon.
Sadly, as Zakaria highlights, America’s aggressive trade policies may disrupt markets and erode trust in U.S. leadership globally. The consequences of such missteps can be far-reaching, leading to a decline in American soft power—an essential element that solidifies the U.S. position as a global leader.
In conclusion, the U.S.-China economic relationship illustrates a complex web of interdependence where power dynamics are shifting. Zakaria’s insights serve as a cautionary tale: in this new multipolar world, direct coercion may yield resistance rather than compliance, putting the U.S. in a precarious situation. The ongoing misjudgment of China’s leverage, alongside unilateral economic actions, could compromise not only the U.S. economy but also its standing on the world stage. To navigate these challenges effectively, there needs to be a fundamental rethinking of how the U.S. engages with its global partners, ensuring that the approach is rooted in a keen understanding of the contemporary economic landscape.
Source link
