The wireless industry continues to be a pivotal aspect of contemporary life, significantly influencing teleworking, distance learning, telemedicine, and other daily interactions. This blog post encapsulates key developments in the U.S. wireless sector for November 2025, focusing on regulatory actions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and legislative initiatives aimed at improving connectivity and safeguarding the communications supply chain.
Regulatory Actions and Initiatives
Securing U.S. Communications Networks
On October 28, 2025, the FCC took noteworthy steps to bolster national security by adopting a Second Report and Order alongside a Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. These actions propose significant revisions to the Commission’s Covered List, which identifies communications equipment and services that pose security risks. This list now explicitly includes modular transmitters, reinforcing a ban on their authorization within the U.S. supply chain.
The FCC is actively soliciting public feedback on potential extensions of this prohibition to other components such as semiconductors and firmware. This proposal aims to assess how introducing additional restrictions may influence the overall supply chain for critical telecommunications components. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit comments and replies regarding these proposed changes, with deadlines set for 30 and 45 days post-publication in the Federal Register.
Strengthening Compliance and Enforcement
Following the announcement of its new orders, the FCC issued an Advisory to enhance awareness about the restrictions associated with the Covered List. This Advisory not only details currently listed equipment but also outlines the obligations of subsidiaries and affiliates related to these restrictions. Additionally, FCC Chairman Carr announced efforts to collaborate with leading e-commerce platforms to remove listings for millions of items deemed non-compliant, including products from companies such as Huawei and Dahua. These initiatives demonstrate the FCC’s commitment to enforcing compliance across different sales channels.
The FCC also initiated withdrawal proceedings for several accredited testing laboratories due to alleged non-compliance linked to foreign influence. Entities such as the Chongqing Academy of Information and Communications and TUV Rheinland-CCIC Ningbo Co., Ltd. were cited for failing to demonstrate independence from foreign governments, specifically the People’s Republic of China. They will have until November 28, 2025, to contest these findings.
Spectrum Management Developments
In addition to securing communications networks, the FCC proposed alterations to spectrum management, particularly concerning the Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service (UMFUS) bands. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aims to facilitate more intensive spectrum use and explores the possibility of allowing greater cooperative use of the spectrum for satellite services. This shift would involve simplifying licensing processes and adapting regulatory criteria to enhance operational efficiency.
The Commission is also pursuing the elimination of outdated and duplicative wireless service regulations through a Direct Final Rule. By reducing regulatory burdens, the FCC aims to foster innovation and support for new wireless technologies. Stakeholders have 20 days post-publication in the Federal Register to comment on these proposed deletions.
Legislative Developments
In tandem with regulatory measures, legislative efforts are underway to enhance the transparency of the communications sector. On October 23, 2025, the Senate passed the Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act, which mandates that the FCC publish a list of licensees affiliated with foreign adversarial governments, including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. This initiative aims to ensure that national security considerations are front and center in U.S. telecommunications policy.
This act has now moved to the House for further consideration, signaling growing bipartisan commitment to transparency and security in the wireless industry.
Market Implications
The broad spectrum of FCC initiatives and legislative actions indicates a proactive approach to managing risks associated with the rapid evolution of the wireless industry. The fallout from the new regulations and legislative frameworks will likely impact various stakeholders, including manufacturers, service providers, and consumers.
Wireless companies may need to adapt their supply chain strategies in response to heightened compliance requirements, and software development may shift to accommodate evolving standards related to component safety and security.
Conclusion
In summary, the wireless industry remains at the forefront of technological evolution, with continuous adaptations to ensure that national security and consumer safety remain priorities. The actions taken by the FCC, combined with ongoing legislative efforts, demonstrate a collective commitment to fostering a secure and efficient communications environment in the United States. As policymakers navigate the complexities of modern telecommunications, stakeholders across the industry will need to stay engaged and responsive to these evolving regulations and initiatives.
