Talk surrounding the end of penny production has been a long-standing conversation among government officials and economists. Recently, this dialogue took a decisive turn when President Donald Trump announced over the weekend that he had ordered the U.S. Treasury to cease minting new pennies. In his words, “For far too long, the United States has minted pennies which literally cost us more than 2 cents. This is so wasteful!”
The announcement reflects a growing sentiment among economists and policymakers who argue that the costs associated with penny production far outweigh their utility. According to the Federal Reserve, there are approximately 114 billion pennies in circulation, representing a mere 0.006% of the total money supply. However, producing pennies incurs an annual cost of around $192 million, accounting for about 4% of the Mint’s operating budget, a statistic that few would argue warrants that level of expenditure.
### The Cost of Making Pennies
David Gulley, an economics professor at Bentley University, estimates that manufacturing a penny costs nearly three cents. This situation creates an economic burden, as millions of these coins inevitably disappear each year, leading the U.S. Mint to produce replacements continuously. The inherent inefficiencies in penny production have made the coin increasingly expendable in the eyes of many financial experts.
### Impacts on Pricing Structures
However, the elimination of the penny could significantly impact the pricing of small-ticket items. Many experts, including Gulley, suggest that without the penny, prices will likely have to be rounded to the nearest five cents for cash payments. This means that $6.99 fast food combo meals could become a thing of the past.
While some assert that rounding prices upward may lead to inflationary effects, research indicates that the impact would be minimal. David Smith, an economics professor at Pepperdine University, pointed out that similar changes in Canada—where the penny was eliminated in 2013—did not lead to significant inflation. Cash transactions in Canada were rounded to the nearest five cents, lessening the potential for a dramatic rise in prices.
### Rounding and Its Implications
Discussions around rounding emphasize the importance of understanding consumer behavior. Some economists speculate that businesses could be more inclined to round prices up, resulting in costs being transferred onto consumers. Ajay Patel, a professor at Wake Forest University, has suggested that eliminating the penny may produce a “rounding tax” for consumers, as observed in the Canadian experience.
However, these rounding fees may not significantly affect individual consumers. A 2017 study in Canada estimated that the rounding adjustments led to approximately $3.27 million being passed from consumers to retailers, but for individual stores, this translated to negligible increases in revenue.
### The Impact on Cash Consumers
One of the major concerns surrounding the removal of the penny relates to cash consumers. Although fewer transactions are conducted using cash—dropping from one-third in 2015 to under 20% today—those who rely on cash will be the most affected. These individuals, often from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, might experience a harder hit as they would lack access to debit or credit cards.
While President Trump’s order effectively halts new penny production, it does not eliminate the current pennies in circulation. Consumers will continue to use pennies until they are gradually phased out, as they are returned to the banking system and melted down for their material value.
### Future Value of Pennies
Interestingly, the hoarding of pennies might turn into a potentially profitable endeavor in the long term. Financial expert Gates Little notes that as pennies become scarcer, their individual values may increase. “Pennies would become more scarce over time and eventually increase in value,” he explained, suggesting a gradual transition where people could convert them into higher denominations.
Laura Maike, from Burton, Ohio—an area where cash transactions remain the norm among the local Amish community—expressed concern regarding the implications of penny elimination on cash-only transactions. She also shared her belief that existing pennies could eventually appreciate in value.
### Environmental Factors and Supply Costs
Beyond the economic implications, Smith also pointed out that there are environmental costs associated with penny production, such as mining zinc and copper. Hence, eliminating the penny may yield positive environmental outcomes, in addition to reducing government spending.
As this new policy takes effect, some Americans have reacted with humor, noting the irony of how people will now give their “two cents” in a world with no pennies. However, experts are urging the public to maintain awareness of the other coins, particularly the nickel, which currently incurs even higher production costs.
### The Road Ahead
The transition away from the penny is unlikely to be instantaneous; it could span many years as existing coins remain in circulation. With consumers adapting to a cashless future, the focus will shift to broader implications for the economy and individual financial behaviors.
In summary, while the end of penny production might simplify some aspects of financial transactions and potentially contribute to increased efficiency in the Mint’s operations, the impacts will ripple through different sectors, particularly affecting cash users and pricing structures around the country. As society evolves toward a cashless economy, understanding these changes will ultimately benefit all consumers, regardless of their banking status.
Source link
