Home / NEWS / Top 10 SEC rivalries that won’t be played every year in the 9-game schedule era

Top 10 SEC rivalries that won’t be played every year in the 9-game schedule era

Top 10 SEC rivalries that won’t be played every year in the 9-game schedule era


In the ever-evolving landscape of college football, the SEC (Southeastern Conference) remains a powerhouse known for its historic rivalries and fierce competition. As the conference adapts to a new 9-game schedule era, many classic matchups will be left on the cutting room floor, raising concerns and sentiments among fans, players, and coaches alike. This article explores the top 10 SEC rivalries that won’t be played annually under the new scheduling framework.

### Keyword: SEC Rivalries

The SEC’s scheduling model aims to preserve traditional rivalries while promoting competitive balance among its 16 member teams. Yet, some beloved matchups are being sidelined. The league recently announced its upcoming opponent pairings for the next four years, and the results have been met with mixed emotions. Here, we explore the top rivalries that, for now, will not take place every year, delving into the historical significance of each match.

#### 1. Alabama-LSU

Perhaps the most impactful absence is the storied rivalry between Alabama and LSU. This matchup has been a key component of the November calendar since 1964. Often featuring top 10 teams, the games have proven vital in determining playoff implications and conference supremacy. Despite the intensity and historical importance of this rivalry—ranked No. 14 in The Athletic’s Top 100—the SEC’s desire to maintain Alabama’s rivalries with Auburn and Tennessee led to its exclusion from the annual schedule.

#### 2. Tennessee-Florida

Tennessee and Florida’s rivalry, which gained traction when the SEC realigned in 1992, has produced some remarkable contests over the years. Both teams have had their moments as national powerhouses since then, but with each school having other vital annual matchups—Tennessee with Alabama and Vanderbilt, and Florida with Georgia—this rivalry has slipped to rotational status, which leaves fans disappointed.

#### 3. Alabama-Georgia

While not a primary annual matchup, the Alabama-Georgia rivalry remains significant, especially in the context of recent national championships and playoff contests. However, with Alabama’s strong ties to Auburn, Tennessee, and the historical nature of its rivalries, this matchup will see limited frequency—though facing off twice in a four-year span is still commendable given the stakes involved.

#### 4. Tennessee-Georgia

Both Tennessee and Georgia are among the most rival-rich teams in college football, so their series often gets overshadowed. Although the rivalry has shown flashes of brilliance recently, including a high-stakes game in 2022, it has frequently fallen victim to the competitive landscape, allowing other matchups to take precedence. This duel has produced memorable moments, but it will now alternate rather than be an annual fixture.

#### 5. Florida-LSU

The Florida-LSU rivalry has highlighted some sensational matchups since the early 70s. Known for unpredictable outcomes and thrilling plays, the importance of this matchup was solidified when the SEC changed its scheduling policy. The rivalry remains significant, but factors such as divvying up rivalries among teams pushed it off the annual roster, disappointing many fans who look forward to this game.

#### 6. LSU-Mississippi State

The LSU-Mississippi State matchup has been a frequent affair, but it has been lost in the shuffle of the SEC’s new scheduling approach. Despite being played 117 times, this rivalry is less prioritized than others, as LSU focuses on its contests against Auburn and Texas A&M, while Mississippi State holds onto its rivalry with Ole Miss.

#### 7. Auburn-Florida

Auburn and Florida have long had a compelling rivalry that spanned decades but has fallen victim to competitive imbalance in the SEC scheduling. As Auburn focuses on its contests with Alabama and Georgia, the Florida rivalry has been sidelined. Many fans lament the loss of this series, which produced intense matchups over the years.

#### 8. Texas A&M-Arkansas

The storied Texas A&M-Arkansas rivalry, originating from the Southwest Conference, will transition to a rotational schedule after 2026. Although the two teams have enjoyed an annual battle since 2009, the need to maximize scheduling balance among SEC teams led to this change, which has left many wondering how the series’ dynamic will shift moving forward.

#### 9. Ole Miss-Arkansas

The Ole Miss-Arkansas rivalry has provided some iconic moments, especially given their close geographic proximity. However, with Arkansas focusing on its rivalries with LSU and Missouri, the games between these two schools will no longer be played annually. The series has a rich history, contributing to a disappointment for fans of both teams who wish to see it preserved in the new schedule format.

#### 10. Kentucky-Vanderbilt

Though not as storied as others, the Kentucky-Vanderbilt rivalry is significant to both programs. Historically, they have played consistently since 1953, creating a camaraderie that extends to alumni. However, the SEC’s balancing efforts led to this matchup being sidelined in lieu of more competitive games, leaving fans from both sides disheartened.

### Conclusion

As fans, we cherish the traditions that rivalries bring to college football. The SEC’s 9-game schedule may aim for competitive balance, but it comes at the expense of some iconic matchups. From Alabama-LSU’s fierce battles to the historically rich Tennessee-Florida rivalry, the reshuffled schedule has left gaps that will be felt in stadiums and among fanbases. As we look ahead, it remains to be seen how these changes will impact future generations of players and fans who may miss out on these historic contests. Nonetheless, the hope is that these classic rivalries find their way back into the conversation, enriching the game we all love.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *