Russia fears another loss in Middle East from Iran’s conflict with Israel

In recent weeks, growing tensions in the Middle East, particularly surrounding Iran’s conflict with Israel, have prompted fresh concerns in Moscow. As Russia contemplates its position in the region and the implications of these developments for its foreign policy, the nation faces a pivotal juncture that might reshape its alliances and influence in the Middle East.

When Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, Russian officials expressed alarm at the escalation of violence. The Kremlin’s reaction underscores a significant apprehension: yet again, Russia might find itself on the losing side of a conflict in which it has vested interests. Russian media, however, were not entirely pessimistic, suggesting that there could be potential benefits for Moscow. The rise in global oil prices could be a financial windfall, while the conflict might distract the world from Russia’s ongoing challenges associated with its war in Ukraine.

Some analysts argue that the geopolitical landscape is shifting, providing Moscow with an opportunity to step into a role as a mediator in the Middle East. If Russia were to be accepted as a neutral party in this turmoil, it could reposition itself as a key player on the world stage, and afford it an image of a peacemaker, even amid its controversial actions in Ukraine. However, this perspective has been tempered by the stark reality that the ongoing military operations are fraught with risks for Moscow.

Russian political scientist Andrei Kortunov articulated the sentiment that the escalation carries serious repercussions for Russia. The inability of Russian leadership to prevent Israeli strikes on Iranian territory starkly contrasts with the earlier declaration of a strategic partnership between Moscow and Tehran, signed a mere five months ago. This agreement was framed as a collaboration bolstering peace and security; however, it described no obligation for military intervention.

Russia’s reliance on Iran, particularly in the context of the supply of Shahed drones for its military engagement in Ukraine, further complicates its standing. Despite the growing partnership touted by officials like Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, the lack of military support for Iran during its time of need casts a long shadow over Moscow’s diplomatic credibility. The partnership does not extend to military commitments, which has become painfully apparent as Israel retains the upper hand in the confrontation.

Adding to Russia’s worries is the recent loss of another key ally in the region: Bashar al-Assad of Syria. Following the upheaval that removed him from power, the prospect of Iran — an essential ally for Moscow in the Middle East — facing significant internal challenges raises alarms in the Kremlin. The potential for another regime change in an already volatile environment could further isolate Russia and diminish its influence across the region.

In reflecting on the unfolding events, state-run media has cautioned about the transformative geopolitical changes occurring globally, which stand to directly or indirectly affect life in Russia. This perspective acknowledges a frequently overlooked truth: Russia’s foreign policy is tightly interwoven with developments beyond its borders, particularly in the Middle East, where its roles and alliances are frequently reassessed.

As Russian President Vladimir Putin prepares for the annual International Economic Forum in St. Petersburg, the meetings gain additional layers of significance. Once known as “Russia’s Davos,” the forum no longer attracts high-profile Western business executives, particularly since the invasion of Ukraine. Nevertheless, the organizers claim attendance from representatives of over 140 countries and territories this year. This aspect fosters speculation that Russia might use the forum to demonstrate its supposed resilience against international isolation due to the war in Ukraine.

During this period, the Kremlin’s public communications about the Middle East — particularly regarding Iran and Israel — will be closely monitored. Observers are keenly aware that geopolitically charged dialogues could arise, potentially shaping not just Russia’s future interactions in the Middle East, but also influencing its overall positioning on the global stage.

As the situation in the Middle East evolves, Russia is indeed at a crossroads. It must navigate the complexities of international allegiances, potential economic benefits, and the danger of overextending itself in a region where it has much to gain but equally much to lose. The interplay of these factors will undoubtedly mold the Kremlin’s future strategy, as it grapples with the consequences of geopolitical missteps amidst an ongoing war in Ukraine and increasingly vocal adversaries in Israel and elsewhere.

In conclusion, the unfolding conflict between Iran and Israel serves as a catalyst for deeper contemplation within Moscow. The Russo-Iranian partnership, while robust in narrative, lacks the military operational robustness that many had hoped for. As Russia navigates this challenging landscape, the stakes are undeniably high, both for its alliances in the Middle East and for its aims on the worldwide front. Being cognizant of these challenges and opportunities will be crucial as Russia attempts to redefine its role in a rapidly changing geopolitical climate.

Source link