Home / TECHNOLOGY / Researchers use AI to help predict and identify subtypes of Type 2 diabetes from simple glucose monitor

Researchers use AI to help predict and identify subtypes of Type 2 diabetes from simple glucose monitor

Researchers use AI to help predict and identify subtypes of Type 2 diabetes from simple glucose monitor


Diabetes is a complex and increasingly prevalent health condition, affecting an estimated 40 million people in the U.S. alone. Traditionally categorized into two types—Type 1, which generally appears in childhood, and Type 2, which is often linked to obesity and develops later in life—scientists are now uncovering that Type 2 diabetes is not uniform. Variations among patients include differences in age of onset, body weight, and other physiological traits.

Recently, researchers from Stanford Medicine have made a significant advancement in this field by developing an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm. This tool can analyze data from continuous blood glucose monitors to help distinguish between various subtypes of Type 2 diabetes—one of the most prevalent health challenges today. This innovation could be a game changer for diabetes care, helping individuals take preventive measures to improve their health outcomes.

According to Michael Snyder, PhD, a co-leader of the study and a professor of genetics at Stanford, this technology is essential for people to monitor their health proactively. The algorithm can provide prediabetes alerts, allowing users to modify their dietary habits or exercise routines in response to their glucose levels. Given that approximately 98 million people in the U.S. have prediabetes, this accessible technology could drastically change the understanding and management of diabetes.

Tracey McLaughlin, MD, a professor of endocrinology and co-leader of the research, highlights the complexity of Type 2 diabetes. While it is commonly referred to simply as “Type 2,” the reality is that multiple physiological mechanisms exist within this diagnosis. By subclassifying Type 2 diabetes—which is responsible for 95% of all diabetes diagnoses—healthcare providers can better understand the associated risks such as cardiovascular disease, kidney issues, and other related complications.

One striking example from Snyder’s own experience illustrates the importance of individualized understanding. After being identified as prediabetic, he initially attempted to counter the condition by increasing muscle mass, a common recommendation. However, he soon discovered that his subtype was actually linked to a deficiency in insulin-producing beta cells, rather than insulin resistance. Such insights highlight the necessity of more tailored approaches to diabetes management.

Published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, the study reveals that existing diagnostic methods mostly rely on blood glucose levels obtained from simple blood draws. While these tests can indicate diabetes, they do not provide comprehensive insights into the biological mechanics causing elevated glucose levels. Current metabolic tests, typically conducted in research settings, are cumbersome and expensive, making them impractical for routine clinical use.

By leveraging continuous glucose monitors readily available to the public, researchers can collect ongoing data about glucose levels and derive a more nuanced understanding of individual metabolic health. For instance, insulin—produced in the pancreas—plays a crucial role in regulating blood sugar. Deficiencies in insulin production or insulin resistance can lead to raised blood glucose levels. Research has shown that various physiologic subtypes might respond differently to treatments, an argument for tailored healthcare solutions.

To test the algorithm’s effectiveness, McLaughlin and Snyder assessed data from 54 participants, comprising 21 individuals with prediabetes and 33 healthy participants. By deploying the AI-powered algorithm, they aimed to identify patterns in glucose fluctuations that could correlate with the different subtypes of Type 2 diabetes. Unlike traditional methods, the continuous glucose monitors enabled participants to compile a more intricate picture of their glucose patterns in real-time, which can help predict subtypes with greater accuracy.

When comparing the outputs of the algorithm against clinical data, including findings from glucose tolerance tests, the AI technology proved fruitful. The algorithm correctly identified different metabolic subtypes—such as insulin resistance and beta-cell deficiency—about 90% of the time, significantly enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Beyond merely improving diagnostics, the benefits of continuous glucose monitoring extend to a broader population. This innovation can also help assess health risks stemming from insulin resistance, which is linked to conditions like heart disease and fatty liver disease. Understanding one’s health status can foster timely interventions that prevent the escalation into more severe complications like diabetes.

Moving forward, McLaughlin and Snyder intend to refine the algorithm further while evaluating a larger demographic of individuals diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. They believe that with increased availability of this technology, healthcare access can improve, particularly for those unable to visit physicians in person. This advancement could prove invaluable for socially or geographically isolated individuals who lack straightforward access to medical care.

This groundbreaking research was supported by a coalition of institutions, including the National Institutes of Health and Stanford University. As we look toward the future, it’s clear that AI has the potential to reshape how we approach chronic diseases like Type 2 diabetes, making healthcare more personalized and proactive. By harnessing technology that fits seamlessly into daily life, patients may find themselves empowered to take charge of their health in ways that were previously unimaginable.

In summary, as our understanding of diabetes evolves, the integration of AI in monitoring and predicting the various subtypes of the disease signifies a pivotal shift in diabetes care. Whether through enhanced diagnostics or more targeted interventions, this wellspring of innovation promises to offer hope for millions afflicted with diabetes today.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *