Opinion | Silver economy far from enough for rapidly ageing Hong Kong

By 2046, a staggering 36% of Hong Kong’s population is projected to be over the age of 65. This demographic shift presents both an opportunity and a challenge for the city, highlighting the urgent need for a more comprehensive approach to aging. Recently, the Hong Kong government announced 30 new measures aimed at promoting what is termed the “silver economy.” While these initiatives may capitalize on the consumption power of the elderly, they fall short of addressing the deeper issues that arise from a rapidly aging society.

The term “silver economy” refers to the economic potential unlocked by seniors, leveraging their purchasing power as they enter retirement. The government’s measures indeed target this demographic, potentially providing a much-needed boost to the local economy. However, we must consider whether such economic initiatives are merely a band-aid over systemic issues that affect the quality of life for the elderly.

From a personal perspective, as a carer for two wheelchair-bound parents, my firsthand experience highlights the shortcomings in how our society supports its aging population. These daily struggles, faced by countless others in similar situations, leave a lot to be desired. There is a critical need for immediate and substantial attention to gaps in infrastructure and support systems.

Navigating Hong Kong can be an uphill battle for those with mobility challenges. With stairways, kerbs, and narrow pathways, the city is far from wheelchair-friendly. The barriers in urban spaces not only hinder accessibility for the elderly but also create additional stresses for their caregivers. Other cities around the world provide valuable lessons in how to approach these issues effectively. Singapore, for example, was celebrated as one of the ten most accessible cities globally according to a 2022 travel survey. The contrast couldn’t be starker; Singapore’s barrier-free accessibility code emphasizes universal design principles, seamless connectivity, and the incorporation of assistive technologies—elements that Hong Kong could greatly learn from.

The systemic challenges extend significantly into healthcare as well. Seniors typically face the daunting task of managing chronic conditions, which require frequent medical appointments. In Hong Kong, the existing healthcare system presents a dilemma: the choice between exorbitantly priced private care or the long waiting times associated with public services. For urgent issues outside regular clinic hours, many have no choice but to crowd the emergency departments of public hospitals. This reliance on already overstressed systems can be detrimental, leading to increased health complications and dissatisfaction among the elderly.

Moreover, there is an emergency of sorts in healthcare access; we need innovative solutions. Telehealth, for instance, has gained considerable traction in other parts of Asia, such as Singapore, where it has become a staple in both public and private sectors. Hong Kong should embrace teleconsultations widely to alleviate some of the pressures faced by the elderly in accessing timely healthcare. By adopting tech-driven solutions, it’s possible to create more flexible healthcare pathways, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.

In light of these challenges, it is essential to recognize that the “silver economy” measures are less a panacea and more an acknowledgment of issues that have long been at the forefront of social discourse. While leveraging the economic contributions of seniors can prove beneficial, we must not lose sight of fundamental systemic shortfalls that affect their quality of life. Sustainable improvement requires a multifaceted approach encompassing urban planning, healthcare innovation, and community support systems.

Cities like Singapore offer blueprints for improved accessibility and support systems aimed at elder care. By learning from their successes, Hong Kong could implement strategies tailored to its unique socio-cultural landscape. Emphasizing designs that accommodate aging in place—where seniors can remain at home for as long as possible—is essential and should include community support frameworks that enable social interactions and reduce isolation.

Additionally, policies should incentivize businesses to innovate products and services that meet the specific needs of the elderly. This could range from housing solutions that cater to aging populations to transport services designed for greater mobility. Encouraging collaboration between government, private sector, and community organizations can help unlock the full potential of the silver economy while ensuring that the most vulnerable members of society—the elderly—are not left behind.

In conclusion, while promoting the silver economy is undoubtedly a step forward, it should not eclipse the pressing need for comprehensive structural changes that involve urban planning, healthcare access, and social equality. As a society, we must prioritize the well-being of our aging citizens, ensuring they have access to the services they desperately need while also actively participating in our economy. The time to think deeply and act quickly is now; we owe it to our seniors to create an inclusive, supportive environment where they can thrive. The journey of aging should be one not defined solely by economic contributions but enriched by dignity, accessibility, and comprehensive care.

Source link