Home / NEWS / Noble Goals: Old Dominion University Researchers Build Human-Centered, Ethical AI for Education

Noble Goals: Old Dominion University Researchers Build Human-Centered, Ethical AI for Education

Noble Goals: Old Dominion University Researchers Build Human-Centered, Ethical AI for Education


In recent years, the landscape of education has been dramatically transformed by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). Researchers at Old Dominion University (ODU) are at the forefront of this transformation, focusing on the development of human-centered, ethical AI technologies tailored for educational environments. Central to their work is the concept of “teachable agents,” which flips the traditional narrative of AI’s role in education, promoting a collaborative partnership between students and AI.

Dr. Jinhee Kim, a professor in the Instructional Design and Technology program at ODU, alongside her graduate assistant Kay “Rita” Detrick, has spearheaded several innovative studies to explore how AI can function not merely as a tutor but as a peer that students can teach. This approach encourages students to take ownership of their learning process, enhancing engagement and understanding. Through a study involving sixth-grade math classes in Florida, Dr. Kim and her colleagues engineered a system wherein students helped an AI solve math problems. Early observations indicated overwhelming excitement among students, who expressed a desire to use the technology outside of the classroom. This sentiment underscores the potential of such systems to facilitate deeper learning by allowing students to articulate their understanding of concepts in a peer-like teaching relationship.

The research conducted by Dr. Kim and Detrick encompasses a wide array of projects aimed at evaluating AI’s role in education, including the measurement of students’ physiological responses while interacting with AI and the creation of emotional support AI to assist stressed students. The overarching aim is to cultivate critical AI literacy among students, enabling them to not only utilize AI effectively but also critique and understand the technology’s limitations.

Students’ interactions with AI systems highlight a growing awareness of their responsibilities as users of such technologies. Many students in the recent studies remarked that explaining concepts to the AI helped clarify their own understanding. They acknowledged the mutuality of the learning process, expressing that teaching the AI instilled a sense of accountability toward their learning journey. Dr. Kim advocates for “human-AI interaction in education,” aiming to create educational technology grounded in sound pedagogical practices that promote effective learning.

The need for AI literacy in education cannot be overstated. As Detrick correctly points out, many educators currently lack the training necessary to integrate AI tools meaningfully into their teaching practices. This gap leaves a void where potentially innovative AI solutions are applied without a strategic framework, often leading to misapplications of technology. Their research insists on the necessity of well-defined educational goals as a precursor to designing effective AI technologies. By establishing clear educational objectives, educators can better tailor AI tools to enhance educational outcomes.

Additionally, the researchers have recognized that AI could play a crucial role in the development of pedagogical frameworks themselves. Dr. Kim’s foray into creating a virtual classroom simulation for future teachers exemplifies this potential. By enabling pre-service educators to practice classroom management within a controlled AI environment, they can hone their skills and develop a deeper understanding of leveraging AI beneficially in the classroom.

Addressing the ethical implications of AI technology in education is also a key focus of Dr. Kim and Detrick’s work. They emphasize the importance of creating ethically-designed AI systems that prioritize student well-being and educational integrity. Highlighting the responsibility of educators to foster critical thinking skills, Detrick notes that the focus must shift from merely utilizing AI to interpreting and interacting with AI-generated content thoughtfully. This critical lens enables students to discern the value of AI outputs and to build upon them constructively rather than simply accepting them at face value.

The collaborative ecosystem necessary for successful AI integration in education, as articulated by the researchers, demands ongoing partnerships between developers, educators, students, and researchers. This model fosters a more nuanced understanding of how AI can be deployed effectively in educational settings. As the educational community journeys toward incorporating AI into everyday teaching practices, the collaborative involvement of various stakeholders will be essential in crafting AI tools that are both user-friendly and pedagogically sound.

In summary, the work being done at Old Dominion University by Dr. Jinhee Kim and her team represents a thoughtful and ambitious approach to integrating AI into education. By focusing on human-centered, ethical AI development, they are not only enhancing educational experiences for students but also setting a precedent for how to think critically about technology in the classroom. Moving forward, their research highlights the need for a balanced relationship between technology and the noble goals of education, ensuring that AI serves as an enabler of, rather than a substitute for, human learning. As educational landscapes continue to evolve, the goals of fostering critical thinking, promoting ownership of learning, and creating ethical AI systems must remain at the forefront of educational discourse.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *