John McEnroe has often expressed deep admiration for Rod Laver, viewing him as one of the greatest tennis players of all time. Laver’s extraordinary ability and athleticism led him to win 11 Grand Slam titles and 8 Pro major titles between 1956 and 1971, marking him as a legend in the sport. However, despite his considerable talent, many believe that Laver could have won far more titles during the 1960s had circumstances been different. McEnroe recently shed light on this issue, explaining a significant barrier that Laver faced during his prime years.
### The Barrier: Turning Professional
In a candid conversation on the ‘Served’ podcast, McEnroe delved into the financial realities of tennis in the 1960s. He pointed out that at the time, tennis lacked the lucrative prize money and sponsorship opportunities that players enjoy today. For athletes like Laver, who had a young family to support, turning professional was a necessary move for financial stability. However, this decision came at a steep cost—once a player turned pro during that era, they were barred from competing in Grand Slam events. As McEnroe articulated, “So for five years, Rod Laver played zero Grand Slam events, even though he was the best player in the world.”
This hiatus from the Grand Slams was a significant hindrance in Laver’s quest for championship titles. It was a time when being part of the amateur circuit often meant sacrificing opportunities for recognition and lucrative earnings.
### The Open Era and Laver’s Comeback
The landscape of professional tennis shifted dramatically in 1968 when the sport entered the “Open Era,” allowing both amateur and professional players to compete in Grand Slam tournaments. Laver was one of the first beneficiaries of this new opportunity. After a five-year absence from the Grand Slam scene, he returned with vigor and quickly demonstrated why he was considered one of the best.
In 1969, Laver achieved a remarkable feat by completing a Grand Slam for the second time, winning all four major tournaments within a calendar year, something that has only been replicated by one other player, Don Budge, in the 1930s. McEnroe emphasized this achievement, asserting, “He won the Grand Slam twice, which is unheard of; no guy has done that since.”
### Financial Realities and Challenges
Laver’s remarkable talent wasn’t sufficiently compensated during his earlier years in professional tennis. McEnroe highlighted that Laver played more than 35 tournaments in 1970 yet earned only $100,000—an amount that pales in comparison to what first-round losers earn in today’s Grand Slam events. The financial constraints highlighted the difficulty Laver faced during the peak of his career, reinforcing McEnroe’s point about the sacrifices he made to finally be able to compete in top tournaments.
Andy Roddick echoed this sentiment, ensuring that today’s players recognize Laver’s invaluable contributions to the sport that, in turn, shaped the financial landscape of modern tennis.
### Recent Grand Slam Attempts
While Laver’s achievements remain monumental, the quest for a Grand Slam title continues in the modern tennis arena. Following Laver’s era, only a handful of players have ventured close to winning all four majors in a year. Most recently, Novak Djokovic came agonizingly close in 2021, winning the first three Grand Slam tournaments before falling short at the US Open.
### Summation and Legacy
Rod Laver’s story is not just about the accolades that he received, but also about the battles he faced to get there. His legacy represents not just the achievements on the court, but also the evolution of tennis as a profession. Through the lens of players like John McEnroe and Andy Roddick, we see an appreciation for the struggles that paved the way for a more inclusive and profitable sport today.
As we look to the future, the question still remains: will any modern player emulate Laver’s two-time Grand Slam success? With emerging talents like Jannik Sinner making their mark in the ATP, the excitement surrounding the potential for future Grand Slam achievements keeps the legacy of players like Laver alive.
In conclusion, while Laver’s career might have been affected by the circumstances of his time, his resilience and extraordinary talent have left an indelible mark on the sport of tennis. The financial barriers he faced serve as a reminder of how far professional tennis has come and continue to inspire future generations of players aiming for greatness.
Source link
