Home / CRYPTO / Iran Orders Crypto Exchange Curfew

Iran Orders Crypto Exchange Curfew

Iran Orders Crypto Exchange Curfew


The central bank of Iran has made headlines recently by imposing strict operating hours on its domestic cryptocurrency exchanges. This decision comes in the wake of a significant security breach involving Nobitex, one of Iran’s largest crypto trading platforms, which lost an estimated $100 million to a pro-Israel hacker group.

According to a blog post from Chainalysis, domestic crypto exchanges in Iran can now only operate from 10 am to 8 pm. This new curfew attempts to mitigate the risk of future attacks, as Andrew Fierman, the head of national security intelligence at Chainalysis, pointed out. He emphasized that such restrictions make incident responses more manageable, noting that “incidents are easier to triage if they’re not happening in the middle of the night.”

The attack on Nobitex occurred on a Wednesday morning, prompting the exchange to take immediate measures. Nobitex had been a crucial platform for Iranian citizens looking to engage in cross-border transactions, which meant that regulatory efforts could also serve to regain some control over finances within the context of geopolitical tensions and potential capital flight from Iran.

Historically, the Iranian central bank has taken a rough stance on cryptocurrencies. For example, in December, it directed a temporary shutdown of all crypto exchanges to prevent further depreciation of the Iranian Rial. The background of ongoing tensions between Iran and Israel adds a layer of complexity to these measures, particularly following multiple strikes on Iranian targets by Israeli forces earlier in June.

In terms of the security breach itself, Nobitex was reportedly exploited for at least $100 million, impacting various cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Dogecoin (DOGE), XRP, and Solana (SOL). A hacker group known as Gonjeshke Darande claimed responsibility, stating they infiltrated Nobitex’s systems and drained its hot wallets. Interestingly, the wallets controlled by the attackers have been deemed “burner wallets,” which lack private key access that would allow for retrieval, effectively removing those cryptocurrencies from circulation. Fierman highlighted that while most hacks are generally motivated by financial gain, this particular event appears to have been politically motivated, aimed at undermining the regime.

Nobitex has since reassured its users by stating that the situation is “under control.” The exchange has severed external access to its servers and is actively moving assets from online hot wallets to offline cold storage to prevent any additional losses. While user access is still unavailable, Nobitex has promised that assets lost in the hack will be covered by their Reserve Fund.

The hack on Nobitex also highlights the critical role this platform plays in Iran’s cryptocurrency ecosystem. Chainalysis reported that Nobitex has welcomed over $11 billion in total inflows, far surpassing the combined inflows of the next ten largest Iranian exchanges, which amount to just under $7.5 billion. This places Nobitex as the go-to platform for Iranian users looking to engage in global markets, especially given that traditional financial avenues are highly limited under existing sanctions.

Interestingly, Nobitex’s connections extend beyond local users; it has been linked to numerous entities categorized as terrorist organizations in the Western world, like the Houthi rebels in Yemen and various sanctioned Russian exchanges. This adds another dimension to the scrutiny facing the exchange amid heightened geopolitical tensions, further complicating the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies in Iran.

In conclusion, Iran’s central bank’s decision to enact a curfew on crypto exchanges illustrates a desperate attempt to bolster security and maintain control over a sector that has gained significant traction despite the country’s restrictive financial environment. The Nobitex hack serves as a consequential reminder of the vulnerabilities that exist in the digital asset space, particularly in a politically sensitive region like the Middle East.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *