While the landscape of television continually evolves, the anticipation surrounding the show Watson and its upcoming second season is palpable. As viewers eagerly await the next chapter, some underlying tensions and predictions may threaten the integrity of the storyline, especially concerning the fate of Sherlock Holmes.
As a quick recap for those who may be out of the loop, season 1 of Watson concluded with a gripping finale that set the stage for numerous challenges to come. Episode 13, titled "My Life’s Work Part 2," revealed that John Watson and his team at UHOP decided to violate their oaths to confront a looming threat stemming from Professor Moriarty. This decision has left many questions unanswered, particularly about Moriarty’s stolen DNA samples, which still pose significant risks as villains could utilize them for their own nefarious purposes.
As the plot thickens, the interpersonal dynamics among the cast members also grow complex. The budding romance between Stephens and Lubbock might create friction, and lingering resentments, especially following Ingrid’s betrayal, could further complicate team dynamics. However, what looms as a serious concern for the series is the potential return of Sherlock Holmes, a role anticipated by many yet approached with skepticism by several fans.
Morris Chestnut, who embodies the character of John Watson, believes that Sherlock Holmes will indeed return in Watson. "I will say Holmes, you know, in the mythology, does come back, and we are part of the mythology," Chestnut said, hinting at the possibility of resurrecting the iconic character within the show. Yet, this sentiment raises concerns among devoted followers of the series. While retreading familiar ground may excite some fans, it could also undermine Watson’s integrity and character development.
In the original mysteries penned by Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock’s return was more than just a narrative twist; it was a carefully orchestrated moment meant to serve specific story arcs. Implementing Holmes’ revival too soon in Watson could risk overshadowing John Watson’s journey of self-discovery and greatness.
The positioning of Sherlock in the narrative is critical. Watson begins after Sherlock’s supposed death, and while voice-overs by Matt Berry as Holmes contribute to thematic introspection, fans worry that an overt resurrection could dilute the show’s essence. In essence, while having Holmes return could serve to please fans of the literary connection, the overall cohesiveness and unique narrative of Watson could suffer profoundly.
It is essential to recognize that the showrunners, including Craig Sweeny, are aware of these implications. In fact, Sweeny has explicitly stated that Sherlock Holmes was initially not meant to return frequently throughout the series. According to Sweeny, the intent is to allow Watson to shine and not compete with the most renowned character in literature. This determination to keep the focus on Watson allows the audience to witness the character’s growth and assertiveness in resolving his challenges, such as the confrontation with Moriarty. This eliminates the overshadowing effect Sherlock could impose.
While it is a tantalizing prospect to see Holmes again, it feels prudent to save such narrative moves for when they are most impactful. This sentiment echoes throughout the fan community, where many agree that the essence of Watson must prioritize John Watson’s individual journey over nostalgic callbacks to Sherlock’s adventures.
The conclusion of season 1 was meticulously designed to further separate Watson from Holmes. By eliminating Moriarty at an unexpected moment, the show aims to carve out a new story arc where Watson operates outside of Sherlock’s significant shadow. This aspect reinforces Watson’s distinct character, empowering him to confront his past head-on and emerge as a figure of prominence in his own right.
As the landscape for season 2 begins to materialize, the available avenues for following the lore of Watson are plentiful. The ongoing narrative can keep the essence of Sherlock Holmes alive without the need for a physical presence. Characters and storylines, like those of Irene Adler and Sebastian Moran, can be integrated or referenced without derailing John Watson’s storyline.
Ultimately, embracing the lore from the original Holmes stories—while allowing John Watson to grow independently—may increase the series’ depth and appeal. Many fans are hopeful that the writers will navigate this tricky terrain carefully and ensure that while Sherlock’s legacy persists, Watson continues to engage us as a robust character in his own right.
In conclusion, while Morris Chestnut’s prophecy regarding Sherlock’s return in Watson season 2 carries weight, a cautious approach should be taken. The focus must remain on Watson’s evolution, allowing audiences to embrace his journey. As Watson continues to unfold, fans are increasingly curious and hopeful for what lies ahead, poised to welcome new developments, character interactions, and the intricate web of relationships that define this compelling narrative.