The recent upheaval within Oklahoma’s mental health agency has spotlighted significant challenges in governance, financial accountability, and the urgent need for reform. The removal of Allie Friesen, the state’s Mental Health Commissioner, has been a contentious point in the ongoing efforts to salvage the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (ODMHSAS) amid a severe budget crisis.
### Background
In March 2024, Friesen took the helm of ODMHSAS, tasked with a daunting objective: to eliminate systemic dysfunction and establish greater transparency in an agency mired in financial mismanagement. However, she soon faced insurmountable challenges stemming from prior leadership that continued to haunt the department.
### Alarm Bells Ringing
By March 5, 2025, Friesen expressed serious concerns regarding the agency’s budget allocations. In a letter to Governor Kevin Stitt, she highlighted alarming deficiencies in the behavioral health program’s funding. Her communication noted the financial burdens inherited from previous administrations, laying out her initial strategy to address these issues.
As the fiscal year progressed, ODMHSAS requested an unsettling $6.2 million in supplemental funding to remain operational. The Governor, responding to what he described as “disturbing discoveries” linked to past fiscal practices, initiated a special investigation into the department. This early probe foreshadowed a series of escalating reviews that highlighted a deep-seated dysfunction within ODMHSAS.
### Legislative Scrutiny Intensifies
The situation worsened on April 14, 2025, when house leaders were compelled to establish a special committee dedicated solely to investigating the financial discrepancies at ODMHSAS. The ongoing inquiries by the State Auditor and the Governor’s Office underscored the necessity for clarity surrounding the agency’s budget crisis.
Just days later, Friesen testified in a legislative hearing, revealing a staggering $43 million budget shortfall. Lawmakers expressed confusion over the incongruity between Friesen’s initial request for $6.2 million and the enormity of the actual deficit. While she acknowledged mistakes made during her leadership, she reiterated that many of the issues were rooted in earlier mismanagement.
### Budget Crisis Unfolds
By May 3, 2025, ODMHSAS announced it faced a critical $23 million shortfall, raising fears about meeting payroll obligations for July. Despite these grim projections, leadership assured lawmakers that salaries would be processed as scheduled, a reassurance that came only after considerable legislative frustration was expressed in private communications.
As fears mounted, additional legislative hearings were convened. During these sessions, Friesen once again testified, but many lawmakers felt unsatisfied with the information provided, voicing concerns about the agency’s financial management capabilities.
### Investigative Measures
Responding to the tumult, the Governor appointed attorney Robert McCampbell as special counsel to lead an independent investigation into ODMHSAS. This step was deemed necessary to ensure transparency in addressing the agency’s myriad issues.
Moreover, it became evident that rather than constructing a new $150 million mental health hospital, state lawmakers pivoted towards renovating an existing facility in Oklahoma City. These shifts were attributed to ongoing budgeting challenges and planning failures, further complicating the agency’s operational landscape.
### State Auditor’s Report
On May 21, the state auditor released a report detailing a $28 million shortfall, slamming both current and prior leadership for poor communication and inflated payroll expenses. The auditor’s findings prompted strong recommendations, including the hiring of a qualified CFO and the implementation of stringent internal audit controls.
### Ouster of Friesen
On May 30, the legislative scrutiny culminated in a historic resolution, with both chambers of the Oklahoma Legislature swiftly voting to remove Friesen from her position as commissioner. The Senate see-sawed to a vote of 43-1, while the House voted 81-5 in favor of her ouster.
This decisive action signified not only a repudiation of Friesen’s leadership but also a broader commitment from state leaders to address the alarming financial and operational dysfunction within ODMHSAS.
### Moving Forward
As Friesen’s brief tenure concludes, Oklahoma must now grapple with the fallout. The task ahead is monumental: stabilizing ODMHSAS, restoring public trust in its services, and putting into place solid mechanisms to prevent such budget crises from arising in the future. The agency’s reform has become a high-stakes endeavor, not just for the legislators involved but for countless individuals who rely on mental health services in Oklahoma.
With the removal of Allie Friesen, the state’s leaders now confront an urgent need for a transparent and effective approach to governance in the mental health sector. Only with strategic planning and dedicated oversight can Oklahoma’s mental health agency emerge from its current crisis and begin to fulfill its critical role in supporting the mental health needs of its citizens.
Source link
