In recent years, the intersection of generative AI (GenAI) and federal workforce planning has emerged as a pivotal focus within government agencies. The pressing question is not whether AI will change the fabric of government work, but rather how. As highlighted in a recent report authored by a team including Terry Gerton and Bill Resh, this transformational period calls for a nuanced understanding of the human core of each job in light of advancing technologies.
The Context of Change
We find ourselves at a crossroads characterized by rapid technological advancements and a changing political landscape. The introduction of GenAI is part of the so-called fourth industrial revolution, signifying profound changes in job roles and the skills required within them. Current federal agencies are grappling with considerable workforce upheaval, making it vital to define what core human competencies must be upheld as these advanced systems proliferate.
Key Findings on GenAI’s Impact
Through extensive consultations with chief technological officers and AI officers across various federal bodies, an array of insights surfaced. Contrary to the commonly held belief that a substantial percentage of jobs will be replaced by AI, the study found that many job roles will undergo augmentation rather than outright replacement. This notion challenges the narrative in popular media suggesting that up to 45% of labor markets might soon vanish.
By dissecting job roles into component competencies, it becomes evident that while GenAI can enhance efficiency and support certain tasks, numerous competencies remain uniquely human. The findings emphasize that GenAI and workforce dynamics are not a binary scenario of replacement or retention, but rather an intricate interplay where technology complements human capabilities.
Competencies at the Forefront
The report identifies several critical competencies that should be prioritized for workforce training and development:
Soft Skills and Emotional Intelligence: With AI taking over technical tasks, the value of interpersonal skills, empathy, and critical thinking becomes paramount. Roles that necessitate human judgment—such as mediation or environmental management—will become increasingly reliant on these human-centered competencies.
AI Literacy: Agencies need personnel who understand AI capabilities and limitations. Training initiatives should focus on raising awareness about how to utilize GenAI effectively while recognizing its ethical implications.
Ethical Decision-Making and Accountability: As the use of AI grows, establishing structures for ethical decision-making becomes necessary. This is particularly vital in sectors dealing with sensitive data, where the implications of AI use can have significant ethical considerations.
- Technical Adaptability: While roles directly tied to software development may evolve, there is still a need for human oversight and intervention. Employees must be adept at interfacing with AI systems to ensure security and integrity.
Strategizing for Workforce Planning
Federal leaders and HR managers should take a multifaceted approach to workforce planning amidst the integration of GenAI. Here are some actionable steps:
Granular Analysis of Job Competencies: Leaders must dissect each job to understand which competencies may be at risk of replacement and which stand to benefit from augmentation. This could inform decisions about hiring, training, or even phasing out certain roles.
Identify Redundancies and Innovations: Understanding the redundancy of specific roles due to automation can help agencies strategically reduce workforce numbers without compromising essential functions. By identifying roles that are heavily reliant on repetitive tasks, agencies can orient their hiring strategies accordingly.
Pilot Programs and Targeted Upskilling: To ensure a smooth transition, agencies should embark on targeted upskilling initiatives aligned with emerging technologies. This means offering training specifically designed for the roles most affected by AI, enabling staff to adapt to changing job requirements.
- Foster Collaborative Environments: Establishing partnerships between human workers and AI tools should be prioritized. By recognizing the areas where AI can assist, rather than replace, human workers, agencies can leverage the strengths of both.
Ensuring Ethical and Secure Practices
The use of GenAI comes with its own set of challenges, particularly concerning data security and ethical considerations. As government data becomes a valuable asset for AI systems, ensuring its protection is paramount. Leaders must be vigilant in their approach to integrating AI solutions, ensuring that robust security measures are in place while also navigating the complexities of ethical AI usage.
Conclusion
As we advance into an age increasingly influenced by GenAI, federal leaders face a profound challenge: to redefine the human core of every job within their agencies. The shift from viewing jobs as unitary entities to understanding them as portfolios of competencies is crucial for future workforce planning. By focusing on augmenting job roles with AI, rather than replacing human workers, agencies can cultivate a workforce that’s not only technologically adaptive but also rich in the human skills essential for effective governance.
This pivotal moment in workforce planning encapsulates both the challenges and opportunities presented by GenAI, demanding a thoughtful, informed response from today’s federal leaders. It is indeed a moment filled with potential—where defining the human core of every job can lead to a more efficient, innovative, and responsive governmental workforce.


:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-2235804472-cf352cff3f3244dda177b4e14b9bc6c1.jpg?w=150&resize=150,150&ssl=1)





