Dozens of Chinese graduate students have taken legal action against the Canadian government, accusing Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) of discrimination due to prolonged delays in their study permit applications. This situation has left these students, all accepted into prestigious graduate programs in STEM fields at various Canadian universities, in a state of uncertainty as they anticipate the start of their academic careers.
One of the central figures in this legal challenge is Yixin Cheng, a prospective PhD student in computer science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Cheng, along with 25 other students, claims that their applications have been stalled in the security screening phase for an unreasonably long time. He applied for his study permit in May 2024, expecting to start his program last fall. Instead, he finds himself in limbo, losing out on substantial income—approximately $170,000 due to resigning from a high-paying job—and risking his academic future.
These students’ frustrations stem from a deep sense of injustice. The IRCC’s stated processing time for Chinese applicants is about four weeks, but Cheng noted that he has not received any updates since submitting the last of his paperwork on June 20, 2024. This pattern resonates with other applicants. For example, Li Zhen, who left Microsoft for a PhD opportunity at Polytechnique Montréal, echoes Cheng’s sentiments, expressing concern for his financial stability and mental well-being while waiting for approval.
The core argument of the students and their lawyer, Vakkas Bilsin, centers on the perceived lack of transparency and equity in the application process. They assert that it is unfair for their applications to be stalled indefinitely, particularly given that all 25 individuals share the commonality of being Chinese citizens in STEM programs. Bilsin questioned why extensive security checks are deemed necessary for this specific group of students when they have sound academic backgrounds.
In response, IRCC maintains that their application protocols are fair and non-discriminatory. They pointed out that all applicants, irrespective of their country of origin, must undergo the same security screening processes. However, they also noted that the intricacies of security checks, which are outside of IRCC’s jurisdiction, can lead to unpredictable delays. This statement has not alleviated concerns among the affected students, who have found the process alarmingly opaque.
Professors at the universities where these students are enrolled have expressed their concern regarding the impact of the delays. One such letter from Prof. En-hui Yang of the University of Waterloo highlighted the academic and psychological burdens the uncertainty has placed on the affected students, stating that these delays are causing “significant financial stress” and undermining their academic readiness.
The delays have raised broader discussions about security risks tied to international students, particularly those from China studying STEM, given past security incidents in Canada. Former CSIS director Ward Elcock commented on the heightened scrutiny these applicants face, indicating that safety assessments are an essential part of the application process, particularly in light of national security concerns.
For Cheng, Zhen, and their colleagues, the emotional toll of waiting for a decision is compounded by concern for their futures. Cheng has articulated a negative view of the IRCC’s handling of his application, suggesting it reflects poorly on Canada as a whole, despite his acknowledgement of the kindness of the Canadian people.
As the students continue their legal pursuit to expedite the processing of their permits, they remain hopeful yet anxious. The desire for a resolution is palpable, as they feel trapped at a critical juncture in their academic and professional journeys. They are seeking not only the right to study in Canada but also a fair and transparent process that respects their aspirations.
In summary, the legal action taken by these Chinese students against the Canadian government underlines significant issues regarding immigration, transparency, and the psychological impacts of prolonged waiting periods. As international student numbers rise, the situation sheds light on the challenges faced by applicants and the intricate balance that must be maintained between national security and fair access to education. The hope remains that through their legal efforts, these students will not only find resolution but also contribute to refining immigration processes that facilitate a smoother transition for future international applicants.
Source link
