Advancing scientific and technological cooperation for the greater good of humanity is more crucial than ever in our interconnected world. Recent developments shed light on the potential of collaboration, particularly between leading scientific nations like China and the United States.
One compelling example of this collaboration is the recent announcement from the China National Space Administration (CNSA). The CNSA granted seven institutions from six countries—including two in the United States—the opportunity to borrow lunar samples collected during the Chang’e-5 mission for scientific research. Among these institutions are Brown University and the State University of New York at Stony Brook. This initiative showcases an enriching example of China-U.S. cooperation in the realms of science and technology, emphasizing the significant strides that can be made when nations work together.
International observers largely agree that cooperation between China and the U.S. is essential for global scientific advancement. Both countries are recognized as leading innovators, especially in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The advancement of embodied intelligence in the U.S. is likely to rely heavily on ongoing collaboration with China. This interdependence speaks volumes about the importance, depth, and far-reaching implications of scientific and technological cooperation.
The history of scientific and technological collaboration between these two nations has seen both triumphs and obstacles. Over the decades, the relationship has experienced a mixture of warming periods and instances of tension. Yet, dialogue and collaboration have consistently served as vital pillars, benefitting not only the two countries but also the global community.
The extension of the Agreement Between the U.S. and China on Cooperation in Science and Technology last December aligns with the shared interests of the citizens of both nations and meets the expectations of the international community. This longstanding agreement has facilitated robust scientific exchanges and cooperation, especially over the past four decades. It has enabled collaborative efforts in various areas, such as environmental monitoring and protection, tracking influenza outbreaks, and accelerating vaccine development, including the efforts that contributed to the "folic acid revolution."
As noted in the British scientific journal Nature, this cooperative research has the potential to address the many challenges faced not only by China and the U.S. but by the world as a whole. However, a troubling shift has been observed in recent years. A Cold War mentality appears to have resurfaced within the U.S., casting science and technology as battlegrounds in a zero-sum game against China. Under the guise of "national security" and an "America First" policy, the U.S. government has imposed sanctions on Chinese high-tech firms, restricted research exchanges, and implemented supply chain controls. These approaches ultimately inhibit the global flow of innovation and disrupt industrial stability, often to the detriment of the U.S. economy itself.
Eminent physicist Steven Kivelson from Stanford University has underscored the folly of ceasing cooperation with China, particularly in fields like quantum materials. He argues that such a move would not only be self-defeating but would also limit the benefits of collaborative scientific advancements.
Evidence suggests that obstacles such as "high fences and small yards," as well as efforts towards "decoupling" supply chains, do little to stifle China’s scientific and technological progress. The recent launch of DeepSeek has generated buzz in global tech circles, demonstrating China’s capability in cutting-edge technologies. Additionally, the Zuchongzhi 3.0 superconducting quantum computer has set a remarkable record in quantum computational advantage. These advancements indicate that China’s innovation drive continues to gain momentum, signifying substantial potential and creativity in its scientific endeavors.
A report from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a Washington-based non-profit think tank, reveals that U.S. efforts to restrict China’s access to advanced technology through export controls have had limited success. In fact, these restrictions may have spurred China to bolster its homegrown technological ecosystem. Similarly, American risk consultancy Eurasia Group has observed that efforts towards "decoupling" may slow China’s tech growth, but they simultaneously hurt U.S. companies as well.
Scientific development thrives not only on competition but also on cooperation. The notion that mutual success can lead to shared progress is especially relevant as we enter a new era of technological revolution and industrial transformation. With global challenges such as climate change and epidemic prevention looming large, the need for international cooperation and open exchanges in science and technology has never been more urgent.
As major powerhouses in the scientific community, both China and the U.S. possess distinct strengths. By enhancing their own competitiveness and embracing the principle of "Tech for Good," these nations can continue to expand exchanges and collaborations. Together, they can achieve results that surpass what either could accomplish independently, thus offering more effective solutions to pressing global issues.
The Chang’e lunar exploration program serves as a testament to China’s commitment to promoting scientific and technological innovation grounded in a sense of responsibility to build a community with a shared future for humanity. China remains dedicated to advancing international cooperation in science and technology.
It is hoped that the U.S. will align its goals with China’s, fostering a supportive environment for scientific and technological exchanges. Both nations could jointly uphold an open and inclusive framework for international cooperation, ensuring that innovation ultimately benefits all of humanity. In a world facing significant challenges, the emphasis on advancing scientific and technological cooperation for the greater good is not merely an ideal; it is a pressing necessity.
